|
Post by Stewart on Apr 10, 2019 13:23:19 GMT
There are a number of changes in the rules for next season. A short summary can be found here.Full list and the reasons for the changes can be found via this link.
|
|
|
Post by davethegrave on Apr 10, 2019 17:12:55 GMT
I had read about them but I don't see why they have to keep changing the rules. It should be a simple game (so that even idiots can understand it).
Dead balls in the penalty area don't have to leave the box was one.
The most sensible one is a substituted player having to leave by the quickest route.
|
|
|
Post by ganderpoke on Apr 10, 2019 17:47:00 GMT
With regard to the Goal Celebration rule, I'd suggest that anyone who puts a stupid mask on after they've scored should be forced to wear it for the rest of the game or incur a yellow card.
|
|
|
Post by pinewalker on Apr 10, 2019 22:28:17 GMT
Combining the new goal-kick rule that the ball need not leave the penalty area to be in play with the back-pass rule. Attackers will still have to be ouside the penalty area when the defending team take a goal kick. A keeper taking a goal kick will be able to put his toe under the ball and lift it to a defender standing near him, and so long as the ball hits the defender anywhere but the defender's foot, the goal keeper may then pick the ball up, run to the edge of his area and punt it.
Hmm. I can think of a goal keeper who might find that useful.
|
|
jr
1st team skipper
Posts: 2,164
|
Post by jr on Apr 10, 2019 23:06:34 GMT
They should have taken the opportunity to ban all outfield players from wearing gloves
|
|
|
Post by amberinexile on Apr 11, 2019 10:59:42 GMT
It will be interesting to see how rigorously refs apply the new, law btw, not 'rule', to keepers at penalties. That one foot on or level with the line as the ball is struck would, frankly, need VAR to equate penalty strike with keeper foot movement. Think of the millisecond between the two.
|
|
|
Post by davethegrave on Apr 11, 2019 21:15:31 GMT
With regard to the Goal Celebration rule, I'd suggest that anyone who puts a stupid mask on after they've scored should be forced to wear it for the rest of the game or incur a yellow card. Agreed! Where did this stupid idea come from? Also what is all this about uncontested drop balls?
|
|
|
Post by SG on Apr 12, 2019 11:42:56 GMT
Combining the new goal-kick rule that the ball need not leave the penalty area to be in play with the back-pass rule. Attackers will still have to be ouside the penalty area when the defending team take a goal kick. A keeper taking a goal kick will be able to put his toe under the ball and lift it to a defender standing near him, and so long as the ball hits the defender anywhere but the defender's foot, the goal keeper may then pick the ball up, run to the edge of his area and punt it. Hmm. I can think of a goal keeper who might find that useful. Technically I don't think that would be possible, or at least would be a very risky strategy. There is a combination of the backpass law and unsporting behaviour offences whereby if a defender contrives to engineer a situation where he can legally pass the ball back to his goalkeeper for him to pick it up, that can be punished with an indirect free kick and a caution for the defender. For me, the scenario you describe would fit the bill perfectly there.
|
|
|
Post by pinewalker on Apr 12, 2019 20:21:42 GMT
Combining the new goal-kick rule that the ball need not leave the penalty area to be in play with the back-pass rule. Attackers will still have to be ouside the penalty area when the defending team take a goal kick. A keeper taking a goal kick will be able to put his toe under the ball and lift it to a defender standing near him, and so long as the ball hits the defender anywhere but the defender's foot, the goal keeper may then pick the ball up, run to the edge of his area and punt it. Hmm. I can think of a goal keeper who might find that useful. Technically I don't think that would be possible, or at least would be a very risky strategy. There is a combination of the backpass law and unsporting behaviour offences whereby if a defender contrives to engineer a situation where he can legally pass the ball back to his goalkeeper for him to pick it up, that can be punished with an indirect free kick and a caution for the defender. For me, the scenario you describe would fit the bill perfectly there. I did think of that. You are right that flicking the ball up and heading it back to the keeper is regarded as unsporting behaviour and the International Board have specifically mentioned that, or heading a ball on the ground, so those two tricks at least are in the book and don't require a ref to think outside the box. The IFB have not caught up with the possible new tricks yet and it will be a brave ref who first cautions a keeper who behaves as above because it is not circumventing the backpass rule, and is safer than trying to chip the ball to the defender's head - which is oviously now legal in the area as it was before outside it.
|
|
|
Post by davethegrave on Oct 8, 2019 21:50:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mca on Oct 9, 2019 8:01:14 GMT
was it a 2nd yellow? Because time wasting isn't a straight red.
|
|
|
Post by The Editor on Oct 9, 2019 8:44:00 GMT
Speaking to a ref, at National League level, he said they won't bother unless it is clearly a delaying tactic, or if leaving the field at the nearest point is a threat to safety (eg player leaving in front of nasty away fans). I'd say I've only seen a player leaving at the nearest point about four times at GGL this season; none of the others have been penalised.
|
|
markf
Top Performer
Posts: 3,189
|
Post by markf on Oct 9, 2019 19:18:18 GMT
Not sure many of the refs in the NL could work out if it was a delaying tactic or not.
|
|
|
Post by brisfitboy on Oct 9, 2019 19:34:59 GMT
It was a 2nd yellow.
|
|
|
Post by davethegrave on Oct 15, 2019 22:24:13 GMT
So presumably they couldn't bring on a substitute.
|
|