|
Post by SuttonUnitedFCtv on Jan 7, 2016 0:00:41 GMT
|
|
oohaah
Top Performer
Posts: 3,078
|
Post by oohaah on Jan 7, 2016 11:09:33 GMT
Two clear penalties in my opinion, the second one particularly strange. If he didn't have a clear enough view of the incident that he had to consult with the linesman, how can he decide it was a dive?
|
|
markf
Top Performer
Posts: 3,206
|
Post by markf on Jan 7, 2016 14:04:44 GMT
I suggest he pops over to Amsterdam to understand the true meaning of simulation. Neither of those two incidents were.
|
|
|
Post by Suttontilidie on Jan 7, 2016 15:27:30 GMT
I would say that the way Dundo goes down does look a little over the top, that may be what made the referee's mind up (he still gets it wrong of course, because there is clear contact)
|
|
|
Post by os on Jan 7, 2016 18:53:02 GMT
Both probable penalties for me, although Dundo does go done easy, still a pen and no way a dive as there is clear contact. As for there one looks like a tangle of legs, probably not deliberate but still a penalty.
|
|
|
Post by skillspaybills on Jan 7, 2016 18:56:27 GMT
I was down the other end and thought it was a pen.
Then again i thought their goal was offside (badly wrong) and i was only few yards away lol.
|
|