|
|
Post by SuttonUnitedFCtv on Apr 6, 2014 22:29:42 GMT
|
|
mike
Spectator
Posts: 6 
|
Post by mike on Apr 6, 2014 23:24:25 GMT
Looking closely at the equaliser for 2-2 it is difficult to imagine that it was anything but miles offside, especially when you consider that for the goal to have been legitimate both Maidstone players who touched the ball (the receiver and the scorer) would need to have been onside when the free kick was taken. Still, it's done now and I guess you've got to take the bad with the good and just get on with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by nigcapgue on Apr 7, 2014 8:14:52 GMT
Looking closely at the equaliser for 2-2 it is difficult to imagine that it was anything but miles offside, especially when you consider that for the goal to have been legitimate both Maidstone players who touched the ball (the receiver and the scorer) would need to have been onside when the free kick was taken. Still, it's done now and I guess you've got to take the bad with the good and just get on with it. Hi! I agree There is also a strong suggestion that the receiver controlled the ball with his hand. Surely the 1st MU goal was offside the guy is standing in front of JB when the scorer kicked the ball |
|
mike
Spectator
Posts: 6
|
Post by mike on Apr 7, 2014 10:13:54 GMT
I agree - one of those days!
|
|
markf
Top Performer
Posts: 3,326
|
Post by markf on Apr 7, 2014 17:34:51 GMT
Can't tell about the second from the angle of shot but the first is well offside. As I said you cannot trust the match officials at this level (or the PL after the Boleyn Ground yesterday). C'est la vie.
|
|
