|
Post by os on Jan 25, 2010 19:11:02 GMT
I did not see Kev's challenge as my view was obscured by other players, but one thing was clearly audible and that was that he played the ball big time. It can only of been the follow through and initially the ref looked happy with the challenge anyway. I also don't think that the penalty was a booking as the player was not in a goal scoring position still had lots to do even if he got past Kev, just an ordinary foul to me?
On TAFC goal 2 forwards went flying in and I initially thought one got Kev and the other headed in but difficult to tell from 90yards away, Honsec may of had a better view?
|
|
|
Post by garethl on Jan 25, 2010 19:31:46 GMT
Didn't think he got anything of the ball. I think he was lucky not to be sent off for the 1st incident, reckon 70% of the time a keeper goes for that. The 2nd one, whilst work to do for the forward, the keeper was out of his goal so again pretty fortunate - I've seen yellow cards given for less.
Couldn't tell whether it was a foul for the goal, too far away. All irrelevant now I guess!
|
|
frakey
1st team Player
Posts: 1,757
|
Post by frakey on Jan 25, 2010 19:33:43 GMT
Said my piece on the first incident, elsewhere. As for the challenge for the penalty it looked stupid rather than malicious & there had been plenty of similar challenges before that had gone without a caution, so I was not surprised he didn't get a second yellow.
|
|
Millsy
1st team skipper
Posts: 2,246
|
Post by Millsy on Jan 25, 2010 19:46:08 GMT
1st challenge - very late and nowhere near the ball, I was expecting a red! On what the ref said afterwards and seemingly backed up a photo, I understand now why he got away witha yellow. Note the phrase 'got away with'!
2nd challenge - a bit clumsy - ref's explanation for no card apparently was that it wouldn't have been a yellow elsewhere on the pitch so wasn't a yellow then - my personal opinion is that KS was a bit lucky again but (again) personally, I agree with the ref and his explanation, and what Frakey said.
Goal - KS was claiming a shove by the 11 (I think) - refs sometimes give them but I wasn't surprised that no foul was given, my verdict - goal!
|
|
|
Post by doublebarrel on Jan 25, 2010 19:47:27 GMT
I was in line with the penalty area and Kev made contact with the ball but it was a big swing that looked bad. The second incident was just a touch - clearly a foul and a pen but not a second booking. As for the challenge at the end, I thought it was a clear foul and indeed some of the TA supporters were laughing at the decision to award a goal. But Kev is not the sort of guy to make excuses about an incident like that and talking to him after the game he didn't.
|
|
|
Post by vern on Jan 25, 2010 20:04:54 GMT
Fu ck it we beat the pikeys.
|
|
filbert
1st team Player
Posts: 1,177
|
Post by filbert on Jan 25, 2010 20:44:48 GMT
segregation? ;D
|
|
|
Post by sallycat on Jan 25, 2010 22:02:35 GMT
Fu ck it we beat the pikeys. Oh, Vern! By the way, has anyone else noticed that "Tonbridge Angels" is an anagram of "gloating benders"?
|
|
filbert
1st team Player
Posts: 1,177
|
Post by filbert on Jan 26, 2010 10:48:53 GMT
Education not Segregation Vern. That's what Sal has
|
|
taz
Top Performer
Posts: 3,760
|
Post by taz on Jan 26, 2010 12:21:08 GMT
How about sterilisation?
|
|
|
Post by sallycat on Jan 26, 2010 13:34:11 GMT
For whom?
|
|