|
Post by SuttonUnitedFCtv on Mar 7, 2013 2:47:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by presssec on Mar 7, 2013 10:15:25 GMT
With the benefit of the 'corner cam' does anyone else think that our first goal looks a lot more offside than their first?
|
|
|
Post by baboonfish on Mar 7, 2013 10:22:27 GMT
Beautiful. Especially love seeing Lovelock run the length of the pitch in seconds to join in the celebrations! Damn he's quick! Also, can clearly see Downer's touch on the ball leading to the 2nd goal. Should have been a throw in not a free kick/yellow. I saw it from up in the stands yet the lino misses it from five yards away.
|
|
oohaah
Top Performer
Posts: 3,142
|
Post by oohaah on Mar 7, 2013 10:52:24 GMT
Yes, presssec, clearly offside, and agree with baboonfish too.
|
|
Millsy
1st team skipper
Posts: 2,246
|
Post by Millsy on Mar 7, 2013 15:35:00 GMT
Also, can clearly see Downer's touch on the ball leading to the 2nd goal. Should have been a throw in not a free kick/yellow. I saw it from up in the stands yet the lino misses it from five yards away. No - clearly shows that he plays the man - the age-old shout of, "he got the ball" is obsolete, a misnomer. The only possible argument against a caution is that it was a genuine attempt to play the ball; many referees try not to issue a caution in that circumstance.
|
|
|
Post by SuttonUnitedFCtv on Mar 7, 2013 16:09:16 GMT
Yep, sufctv thinks there is a hint of offside in our opener There 1st looks tight but the ball travelled a long way and the run may well have been timed spot on? SD nowhere near the ball takes the man, a caution not unreasonable? Our penalty looks a bit soft so maybe justice was done? The highlights fairly reflect the match and anything other then a U's win would have been a travesty.
|
|
|
Post by presssec on Mar 7, 2013 16:38:00 GMT
Love the euphemistic 'hint'.
Interesting that on the video the penalty looks softer than it did at the time, standing next to the PA box, not that far away from where you were filming, when I thought it was nailed-on. Excellent highlights, and quite stirring seeing the efforts of the last ten minutes rewarded right at the end, and the reaction to the winner.
|
|
|
Post by johnnie1 on Mar 7, 2013 18:54:27 GMT
Excellent filming and editing this week, much better than Bromley's version.
|
|
|
Post by Stewart on Mar 7, 2013 19:19:13 GMT
I think it's time for the payers to seek out the goal line camera for their celebrations ;D
|
|
|
Post by Andy K on Mar 7, 2013 19:43:38 GMT
Great highlights, but please make the effort to spell players' names correctly. Opposing players can be a bit cringeworthy, but when there is a spelling mistake in our own team, that, in my opinion is unacceptable.
|
|
|
Post by SuttonUnitedFCtv on Mar 7, 2013 20:28:03 GMT
After 6 hours of editing and at 2.20am this morning when we finally got it finished if someone had said that to us then we would have punched them right up the bracket!!!
|
|
|
Post by sallycat on Mar 8, 2013 19:37:32 GMT
Get it right in the first place then! LOL ;D
Only teasing but you do see those names written down several times a week.
|
|
|
Post by SuttonUnitedFCtv on Mar 8, 2013 19:58:14 GMT
Unfortunately I missed it when I proof read it at 2.20am, it will not happen again SORRY!
|
|
|
Post by Juan on Mar 8, 2013 20:03:18 GMT
Does it really matter, I mean really!! This Os fella gives you free highlights week in week out, spends his own time putting together these FREE highlights for people to see! If it was me , I would do away with it! The highlights after all are a FREE service for people that don't subscribe to watch the whole game!
So perhaps instead of being so critical of the fact, that you are getting a free service, perhaps you should be a little more forgiving in the fact the spelling mistakes make no difference to the actual well worked footage!
Too many people winge and moan at any/every possible chance at anything they can on this forum. About time people enjoyed it a tad more.....
Juan
|
|
billy
1st team skipper
Posts: 2,648
|
Post by billy on Mar 8, 2013 20:12:02 GMT
Quite right mate.Let's get rid of the grammar police...........
|
|