|
Post by Stewart on Mar 8, 2018 21:58:18 GMT
The debate continues..... English Football League could face legal action from non-league clubs over rules against artificial pitches The group 3G4US is determined to force a change to the EFL’s rules which state no match in the Championship, League One or League Two can be played on an artificial surface...... LINK
|
|
|
3G pitch
Mar 8, 2018 23:22:29 GMT
via mobile
Post by localboy86 on Mar 8, 2018 23:22:29 GMT
Is ground-sharing definitely out of the question next season IF we go up of course and IF there's no change in the rulings?
Was skimming back through this thread and there was a mention of ground-sharing not being allowed.
|
|
|
3G pitch
Mar 9, 2018 7:56:15 GMT
via mobile
Post by garethl on Mar 9, 2018 7:56:15 GMT
Appears to be the case. Specifically not allowed under current rules I believe. It’s possible I guess, if League 2 clubs vote in 3G, they may be more flexible for an exceptional case?
|
|
|
3G pitch
Mar 9, 2018 8:19:59 GMT
via mobile
Post by localboy86 on Mar 9, 2018 8:19:59 GMT
Specifically not allowed under current rules I believe. Interesting - I must have completely missed this rule change - wonder when this got brought in 🤔
|
|
|
3G pitch
Mar 9, 2018 8:32:53 GMT
via mobile
Post by garethl on Mar 9, 2018 8:32:53 GMT
Not sure it is a new rule. I think otherwise clubs with grounds not meeting the relevant criteria would have taken advantage. There have been a few denied promotion over years due to ground not being up to scratch. Someone will no doubt correct me if wrong!
|
|
|
Post by wisemensay on Mar 9, 2018 10:01:15 GMT
Not sure it is a new rule. I think otherwise clubs with grounds not meeting the relevant criteria would have taken advantage. There have been a few denied promotion over years due to ground not being up to scratch. Someone will no doubt correct me if wrong! I believe this is very much the case. However, maybe there's grounds for the club to cite the "Rochdale precedence" and get the FA to pay for our grass pitch?
|
|
|
Post by pinewalker on Mar 9, 2018 17:50:45 GMT
Fake news travels faster than the truth, is a headline in The Times today, and the report that 94% of PFA members are against artificial pitches because of increased injury risk, therefore shorter careers, and the more direct style of football it promotes goes to prove it. Huh? Where is the evidence?
Mind you most of the PFA won't realise that half the pitches in the Premiership and several in the Championship are no longer 100% real grass. As for increased injury risk - if you can run out on any pitch in boots with 4 studs instead of 2 at the heel - then you don't care about increasing your risk of injury.
Perhaps the real problem is: when you celebrate a goal with a long slide on your knees towards the corner camera on a 3G pitch you are going to fill yours socks down to the shin-guards with rubber granules.
|
|
tonyd
1st team Player
Posts: 1,496
|
Post by tonyd on Mar 9, 2018 18:13:23 GMT
I have a feeling that the ban on ground shares in order to win promotion only operates at non-League level. If we went into the EFL, a ground share would be an option. Brentford, for example, were going to groundshare if they won promotion to the Premier and Griffin Park could not be brought up to scratch.
|
|
|
3G pitch
Mar 9, 2018 22:10:35 GMT
via mobile
Post by sol on Mar 9, 2018 22:10:35 GMT
I have a feeling that the ban on ground shares in order to win promotion only operates at non-League level. If we went into the EFL, a ground share would be an option. Brentford, for example, were going to groundshare if they won promotion to the Premier and Griffin Park could not be brought up to scratch. I’m sure you can groundshare if your coming up from the NL into the EFL. I’ll double check this weekend but i’m almost 100% on that.
|
|
|
3G pitch
Mar 9, 2018 22:23:44 GMT
via mobile
Post by guildrover on Mar 9, 2018 22:23:44 GMT
If that was the case why didn't the likes of Stevenage, Kidderminster and Macclesfield do that back in the 90s when they were denied promotion to the Football League because their grounds weren't good enough?
|
|
jr
1st team skipper
Posts: 2,199
|
Post by jr on Mar 10, 2018 1:47:24 GMT
If that was the case why didn't the likes of Stevenage, Kidderminster and Macclesfield do that back in the 90s when they were denied promotion to the Football League because their grounds weren't good enough? 20 years ago. Things have changed a little! I heard that you’re supposed to have a minimum capacity of 5000 yet Wimbledon is less that that in League 1. Let’s just wait and see what happens when the final whistle goes at the end of the season. No use debating things now as we have no idea what will happen and what the idiotic member clubs and the hierarchy at the EFL will decide
|
|
|
Post by garethl on Mar 10, 2018 6:09:01 GMT
I have a feeling that the ban on ground shares in order to win promotion only operates at non-League level. If we went into the EFL, a ground share would be an option. Brentford, for example, were going to groundshare if they won promotion to the Premier and Griffin Park could not be brought up to scratch. That’s certainly contrary to what Dos said in a recent interview. Essentially stated we’d need a special favour from the EFL as not currently allowed.
|
|
tonyd
1st team Player
Posts: 1,496
|
Post by tonyd on Mar 10, 2018 18:18:43 GMT
Yet another postponement for Eastleigh's mudheap.
|
|
|
3G pitch
Mar 11, 2018 9:22:11 GMT
via mobile
Post by sol on Mar 11, 2018 9:22:11 GMT
I have a feeling that the ban on ground shares in order to win promotion only operates at non-League level. If we went into the EFL, a ground share would be an option. Brentford, for example, were going to groundshare if they won promotion to the Premier and Griffin Park could not be brought up to scratch. I’m sure you can groundshare if your coming up from the NL into the EFL. I’ll double check this weekend but i’m almost 100% on that. And it’s confirmed - you can groundshare if promoted from the NL into the EFL.
|
|
|
Post by pinewalker on Mar 11, 2018 9:48:36 GMT
Yet another postponement for Eastleigh's mudheap. I wonder if they would like to buy a second-hand 3G pitch, the property of one trusted local businessman and currently located in Surrey, which may be on sale in May?
|
|